Grades 8 – 9: Benchmarks of Mathematics Achievement

    Students Reaching International Benchmarks of Mathematics Achievement in Grades 8 and 9

    Exhibit 1.2.3 provides graphical and numerical representations of the percentages of students reaching the TIMSS International Benchmarks in both assessment years (2023 and 2024). These benchmarks are points along the achievement scale that describe the progression of knowledge and skills demonstrated by students with different achievement scores. The Low, Intermediate, High, and Advanced Benchmarks correspond to cut points of 400, 475, 550, and 625 scale score points along the achievement distribution, respectively. Detailed descriptions of these benchmarks with illustrative example items can be found in the TIMSS 2023 International Results and information about the development of the benchmark descriptions is available in Chapter 14 of the TIMSS 2023 Technical Report.

    The TIMSS International Benchmarks are ordered along the same dimension of achievement; therefore, students reaching higher benchmarks have also successfully reached the lower benchmarks. The percentages shown in Exhibit 1.2.3 indicate the proportion of all students who have reached each benchmark, including those who also reached higher benchmarks. For example, in Sweden, an estimated 35 percent of eighth-grade students have reached the High Benchmark. The 35 percent includes the nine percent that also reached the Advanced Benchmark, as well as the 26 percent that reached the High Benchmark but not the Advanced Benchmark. However, all of the 35 percent reached and surpassed the Low and the Intermediate Benchmarks.

    Greater percentages of students reached higher benchmarks in Grade 9 compared to Grade 8 when looking at those benchmarks that are close to the average achievement of the country. Benchmarks further away from the mean of the country will show low growth, no growth, and occasionally even a tiny decrease in the estimate, as these benchmarks are less sensitive to the overall growth for a country with a much higher or lower average achievement. In Sweden, nine percent of students reached the Advanced Benchmark in the eighth grade, whereas in the ninth grade, 15 percent of them reached the Advanced Benchmark. In Korea, 40 percent of students reached the Advanced Benchmark in eighth grade, and this increased to 45 percent by the time they. When looking at the graphical results tab, an increase in the percentages of students reaching the benchmarks from eighth grade to ninth grade is reflected by a shift of the markers to the right.

    While the overall percentage of students reaching each benchmark typically increased, this does not guarantee that every single student who reached a benchmark in eighth grade also reached it in ninth grade. However, as the average achievement grows in all countries, more students reached higher benchmarks in 2024 compared to 2023 in all countries.

Exhibit 1.2.3: Percentages of Students Reaching the International Benchmarks of Mathematics Achievement


Mathematics • Grades 8–9

A legend with four navy blue circles arranged vertically. From top to bottom: a dark navy circle labeled ‘High,’ a medium navy circle labeled ‘Above Average,’ a light navy circle labeled ‘Below Average,’ and a very light navy/gray circle labeled ‘Low.’

Download Files

Country

Advanced
Benchmark (625)

High
Benchmark (550)

Intermediate
Benchmark (475)

Low
Benchmark (400)

( ) Standard errors appear in parentheses. Because of rounding some results may appear inconsistent.
A tilde (~) indicates result not reported because estimation is not reliable.
See Appendix A.2 for population coverage notes 1 and 2.
See Appendix A.5 for sampling guidelines and sampling participation note †.


Suggested Citation

von Davier, M., Kennedy, A. M., Reynolds, K. A., Gonzalez, E., & Khorramdel, L. (2025). TIMSS 2023 Longitudinal International Results in Mathematics and Science. Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center. https://doi.org/10.6017/lse.tpisc.timss.dn2487

Co-funded by the European Union. Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the European Education and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA). Neither the European Union nor EACEA can be held responsible for them.